Back to Research
Academic ResearchJune 23, 2025ROBONOMICS: The Journal of the Automated Economy

Can robots substitute human receptionists? Results from a field experiment

This study tested a robot receptionist in a hotel lobby to see if it could effectively replace human receptionists. While guests felt less social presence with the robot, the number of requests solved and overall hospitality experience were similar to human staff. However, some key reception tasks remain unautomated, so robots cannot yet fully replace human receptionists.

Authors

Klaas Koerten

Article content

What the paper studied

This research addressed the growing interest in using robots to tackle staff shortages and high turnover in hospitality by conducting a real-world field experiment. A robot receptionist was deployed in a hotel lobby, and guests could choose to interact with either the robot or a human receptionist. The study collected data from 166 participants to evaluate whether robots could effectively replace human receptionists in actual hotel operations, moving beyond hypothetical scenarios common in previous research.

Key findings

  • Guests interacting with the robot receptionist reported a noticeably lower sense of social presence compared to those engaging with human staff.
  • Despite this, there was no significant difference between robots and humans in the number of guest requests successfully resolved.
  • The overall hospitality experience, as rated by guests, was similar whether they interacted with the robot or a human receptionist.
  • Some essential reception tasks remain outside the current capabilities of robots, meaning full automation of the reception desk is not yet possible.

Why it matters for hospitality

The findings are significant for hospitality businesses facing operational challenges due to staffing issues. Robots can effectively manage routine reception tasks and maintain service standards, which can help alleviate the impact of staff shortages. However, the reduced sense of social presence and the inability of robots to handle all reception duties highlight the ongoing importance of human staff. This suggests that a hybrid model, combining robots and humans, may be the most effective way to optimize both efficiency and guest satisfaction.

Practical takeaways

  • Consider deploying robots to handle straightforward and repetitive guest inquiries, freeing human staff for more complex or personalized interactions.
  • Retain human receptionists for tasks that require empathy, nuanced communication, or advanced problem-solving skills.
  • Offering a robot receptionist option may appeal to tech-savvy guests or those seeking quick, contactless service, enhancing the guest experience for certain segments.
  • Use robots as a complementary resource to improve operational efficiency, but ensure human staff remain available for critical service elements that robots cannot yet perform.

Tags

hospitality roboticsservice robotshuman-robot interactionhotel receptionguest experienceoperational efficiency

Related research

Academic ResearchJune 10, 2026

Exploring the impact of human-computer interaction on service robot adoption intention in the service industry

This study examines how different human-computer interaction (HCI) styles affect guest adoption of service robots in hospitality settings, depending on the level of guest contact and task complexity. It finds that a master-servant interaction style works best for low-contact, complex tasks by building cognitive trust, while a partner-style interaction fosters emotional trust and adoption in high-contact or simpler tasks. Hotels can use these insights to tailor robot roles and interactions to improve guest acceptance and operational efficiency.

Academic ResearchJune 6, 2026

When Robots Speak: Exploring Conversational Styles, Robot Persona Realism, and Engagement in Hospitality and Tourism Services

Across one field study and three online experiments in restaurants, hotels, railways, and airports, the authors show that emotional conversational styles in AI service robots drive higher purchase intentions than rational styles, with engagement as the mediating mechanism. Robot persona realism moderates the effect: emotional styles work best with highly humanlike robots, while rational styles outperform with less anthropomorphic ones — a style-persona congruence rule for designing conversational AI in hospitality.

For Professors

Submit article for consideration

If you are a professor or researcher and would like to suggest a publicly available article for inclusion in the Research Hub, you can submit it for review and possible inclusion through our dedicated submission form.