What the paper studied
This paper provides a comprehensive review of 284 published studies on service robots in the tourism and hospitality industry. Using bibliometric analysis, the authors map the intellectual structure of the field, identifying the most active research themes and projecting future directions. The review organizes the literature into four main categories: the technology itself, guest responses, employee experiences, and the influence of the physical service environment. The study also highlights the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, which accelerated both the adoption of service robots and the production of real-world deployment data.
Key findings
- Research on robot technology focuses on performance characteristics, types (autonomous vs. remote-controlled), navigation, and interaction modalities. There is a significant gap in capabilities between entry-level and premium robots, and studies offer frameworks for evaluating vendor claims.
- Guest-focused studies reveal that guest satisfaction with robot service is most strongly predicted by perceived competence and warmth. These findings are robust across different markets, hotel types, and guest demographics, and can be addressed through design and testing before deployment.
- Employee-related research is the least developed area. While guest experience has been studied extensively, there is limited understanding of how staff adapt to working with robots, how job roles change, and what organizational support is needed. This is notable because many practical deployment challenges are HR and change management issues rather than technical ones.
- The physical service environment, such as the controlled conditions in hotels, plays a significant role in robot performance and guest interaction. Hotels have seen more successful robot applications compared to less controlled environments like restaurants or outdoor tourism settings.
Why it matters for hospitality
The review demonstrates that service robots are now a well-researched area in hospitality, providing operators with a solid evidence base for deployment decisions. This allows decision-makers to move beyond relying on vendor marketing or intuition. Understanding the factors that drive guest satisfaction and the importance of the service environment can help operators achieve better outcomes. However, the lack of research on employee experiences highlights a critical gap, as successful robot integration often depends on staff adaptation and organizational support.
Practical takeaways
- Carefully assess robot capabilities and design, using research-based frameworks to distinguish between basic and advanced systems and to evaluate vendor claims.
- Prioritize the design and testing of robot interactions to ensure they convey both competence and warmth, as these qualities are key drivers of guest satisfaction.
- Recognize the need for more attention to employee experiences. Invest in organizational support and change management strategies to help staff adapt to working alongside robots.
- Take advantage of the controlled hotel environment to optimize robot performance and guest engagement, learning from successful applications in similar settings.
- Use the wealth of real-world data generated during the COVID-19 period to inform deployment strategies, particularly for contactless services, and to validate the effectiveness of robots in operational contexts.